Kettner and Vine – San Diego

A new homeless shelter is in the planning stages here in San Diego, and as expected, the opposition has come out in force with their lawn signs.

The new shelter will be constructed at Kettner and Vine. Initially I had assumed this was somewhere in Mission Hills, since that’s where I have seen the signs, but it’s actually down the hill near the airport. And while I have the typical reaction to nimbyism as most urbanists do, I generally also have some sympathy, since there are times where their concerns are justifiable. In many cases I completely understand why someone would be against a new building that would directly impact them and their home.

The opposition to this one seems to be mainly misplaced nimbyism, since for many of the houses I come across that are visibly showing their opposition, the effects on their house and immediate neighborhood would be minimal at most.

The Kettner and Vine location is actually a great location for a facility like this. It would located in an area that is industrial in nature, which, if we’re looking to minimize the negative effects on neighborhoods, is exactly where you should site a large homeless shelter. The site does sit on the edge of the industrial area, but it is pretty strongly separated from the adjacent neighborhood by a wall of cars nine lanes wide (Interstate 5). A more perfect location would probably be deeper inside the industrial area, but since we unfortunately have to work with reality, this location is really as good as they come.

There are certainly a few homes that may be impacted with more homeless wandering around, and for them, I’ll give a free pass for going nuts on lawn signs. For most of the homes that I’ve come across voicing their outrage in the form of lawn signage — they’re really too far away, where any negative impacts are likely balanced out by the much larger, positive impacts.

Their opposition website notes a few important points:

Too Close to Schools

The opposition website states that their are “over 10 pre-schools, elementary schools” close to this location. They don’t offer a definition for “close” of course. To most reasonable people looking at a map, there are two private schools that are pretty close; Holding Hands Preschool (0.6 miles away) and Montessori school of San Diego (0.3 miles away). As for the other eight, the distances are too far to be of concern. The next closest is over a mile-and- a-half away.

Tourism Concerns

Another main point highlighted on the opposition website, is that this proposal would “negatively impact tourism”. This one is just odd. A homeless shelter, far removed from tourist areas like this one is, won’t negatively impact tourism. A homeless guy urinating into an ornamental bush in Little Italy negatively impacts tourism. A woman sleeping on a cardboard box in the Gaslamp negatively impacts tourism. More shelters, like this one, and resources to address the homeless issue is exactly what is needed to improve the tourism experience. The notion that this shelter would negatively impact tourism is just a poor argument.

Other General Questionable Arguments

The may be good arguments against this proposal , but opposition groups seem to often dilute their arguments with highly suspect statements, like the ones noted above, or using statements like “situated along a bustling thoroughfare” (who cares?), or “project rushed/no transparency” (is there an actual timeline and a number of public planning sessions that the local nimby population would find acceptable? probably not). There may be perfectly sound arguments around budgets, or the diversion of funds from other strategies to address homelessness, and perhaps the planned size is too large. But once an opposition group starts throwing out whatever points they think may stick, nothing much else they say has much credibility.

Is a homeless shelter at Kettner and Vine a good idea? It probably is. The location seems to minimize the effects on the community as a whole (a solution that doesn’t negatively impact anyone is probably an impossible feat), and there is definitely a substantial need for more shelters. Should it be as large as proposed? I’m not sure. Perhaps it would be more effective as a smaller shelter, but I completely understand the efficiencies that can be gained with larger shelters, and honestly a larger shelter like this one would have a much lighter impact on citizens than numerous, smaller ones spread around in various neighborhoods across the city.